Analysis and Outlook for API and Embedded Service Strategies in Transaction Banking

Insight
Sep 26, 2025
  • Banking/Capital Markets
  • Leasing/Credit
  • New Business Development
  • Design & Architecture
1158607726

Transaction banking refers to corporate banking services that integrate payments and cash management, as well as trade finance. It plays the role of a key piece of infrastructure underpinning corporate economic activity domestically and internationally. Transaction banking is also key revenue source for corporate banking businesses of banks. Hence, maintaining its stability and growth is exceptionally important for the management of financial institutions.

While it is impacted by interest rate fluctuations, on a global scale, the transaction banking market is trending in the direction of stable growth, both in cash management and trade finance. Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the market is expected to be 6%*1 towards 2030. This growth trend is also shown in the performance of major global banks. For example, Citibank’s Treasury and Trade Solutions recorded a growth rate of 23%*2 from FY2022 to FY2024, while HSBC’s Global Trade Solutions and Global Payment Solutions (the total of revenue from its Commercial Banking and Global Banking and Markets) showed a growth rate of 53%.*3

 

The Open Banking trend that dates back to the mid-2010s has transformed the transaction banking business model. As the relationship between banks and companies shifts along with the delivery model of financial services, the benefits for company have become more diversified.

Starting with the transition of the service channels in transaction banking, this Insight will explain the key features of the service models, particularly with use of APIs and analyze the directions of channel models in transaction banking services. It then presents the potential challenges posed to banks by new service models, along with approaches they can gain competitive advantage in the global market. The research was performed with the cooperation of Forrester Research.

About the Author

  • Yoshitaka Yasui

    Director
  • Aya Noguchi

    Aya Noguchi

    Senior Manager
  • Tatsuya Oyama

    Tatsuya Oyama

    Manager

1) Changes in transaction banking service channels

Transaction banking service channels are continuing to evolve with the digitalization needs of companies and the transformation of technology. Since the mid-2010s, banks have developed transaction banking services for corporate clients through the application programming interface (API), driven by advances in Open Banking standards (particularly Europe’s PSD2) and API technology. In addition to real-time payment execution, balance inquiry and data linking, “Embedded services” that incorporate seamlessly into non-financial platforms and business workflows have also emerged (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Changes in transaction banking service channels

*4: Enterprise Resource Planning system (ERP), Treasury Management System (TMS)

2) The API service model in transaction banking

To begin with, Figure 2 shows examples of how APIs are used in three domains of transaction banking.

Figure 2. API use cases in transaction banking services

*5: Some banks classify this as part of cash management or trade finance

Major global banks are proactively developing and deploying API service models responsive to information exchange partners and value-added service models based on these use cases.

Figure 3. Service channels and API service models in transaction banking
  • Client-led interfaces (Direct APIs): Companies embed banking services in their systems through APIs provided by banks. The banking services provided vary but typically include money transfers, balance inquiry and statement returns. This allows companies to make use of necessary banking services without leaving the systems they normally use. Some banks, like Goldman Sachs, even allow clients to open virtual accounts via API.*6
  • Partner-embedded banking (Embedded): A model in which a bank’s transaction banking services are embedded in ERP systems such as those provided by SAP, TMS such as Kyriba, and third-party platforms operated by Fintech companies.*7 As with direct APIs, it allows companies to use the banking services they need through the systems they normally use.
  • Infrastructure-as-a-Service/ Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS): A model in which banks provide financial functions as a “backend,” with the partner company holding the customer contact points. In some cases, the partner company may be a bank client or even another financial institution.

*6: As of August 2025
*7: In Japan, access to banking systems through third parties is only permitted for “settlement agents for electronic settlement systems”

3) Trends in transaction banking service channels by client segment

How will the use of transaction banking channels shift going forward, across different company sizes and business types? The following section shows the characteristics of channel use per company size as of 2025 and the transition through 2028 (please note that it indicates direction patterns, and that differences will arise based on geography, industry and the individual capabilities of different banks).

Use by large multinationals (Annual Revenue: US$1B or more)
Large multinationals have traditionally used multiple banks. At such companies, there is a strong dependence on Host-to-Host (H2H) and Swift in core operations such as money transfers. APIs are commonly used by them for purposes such as real-time balance inquiry and payment status tracking. E-commerce companies are leading adopters of the use of real-time APIs and of the embedded collection services, due to their high-volume of transactions and demand for speed. Conglomerate companies and manufacturing companies tend to demand more advanced cash pooling, internal fund-transfer and ERP-integrated liquidity management. Digital native companies generally find it easy to adopt APIs.
Our predicted trends for market share by service channel (based on number of transactions) from 2025 through 2028 is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Predictions for share of number of transactions by channel in large multinationals (2025 to 2028)
  • Web portals will only be used as exceptions, in ad hoc cases, or in markets where integration is not yet feasible.
  • H2H will remain mainstream in high-volume batch processing for payments or reporting. However, it is increasingly used in tandem with direct APIs, which offer real-time capabilities and are being adopted for use cases such as payment tracking, reconciliation and balance inquiry.

Use by Medium-sized Companies (Annual Revenue: US$100M to US$1B)
In contrast to large multinationals, medium-sized companies have demands for API-first approach across money transfer, reconciliation and balance visibility, due to leaner IT teams and fewer legacy system constraints. Adoption of embedded solutions is rising, especially via ERP or TMS platforms. Logistics and supply chain companies require real-time visibility to manage their accounts receivable and payable. Medium-sized manufacturers using ERPs are moving toward embedded banking models, particularly for reconciliation and liquidity management functions.
Our predicted trends for market share by service channel (based on number of transactions) from 2025 through 2028 is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Predictions for share of number of transactions by channel in medium-sized companies (2025 to 2028)
  • Web portals still play a role, especially for exception handling or smaller subsidiaries.
  • H2H will decline as user companies prioritize agility and faster connectivity/ deployment timelines.*8
  • Indirect APIs will rise often via self-service integration tools. Embedded banking will gain share as more SaaS platforms such as those for accounting and procurement.
  • BaaS will support growth-stage companies looking to add financial services into their offerings.

*8:To initiate H2H services with banks, companies often need to complete the process of converting their file formats to the bank formats. The onboarding process may take months from mapping definition to end-to-end test.

Use by SMEs/ Small Companies (Annual Revenue: US$10M to US$100M)
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and Small companies predominantly have used bank web portals. The adoption of APIs is mainly indirect, through plug-and-play modules from ERP or SaaS platforms, rather than the direct APIs. Banks offering BaaS target this segment. Direct-to-consumer (D2C) and e-commerce companies have been the fastest adopters of embedded finance and marketplace banking. Long-tail SMEs also often reach via third-party platforms or marketplace integrations.
Our predicted trends for market share by service channel (based on number of transactions) from 2025 through 2028 is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Predictions for share of number of transactions by channel in SMEs (2025 to 2028)
  • While web portals will remain widely used, especially for non-automated functions or less tech-mature companies, their share will gradually decline.
  • As SMEs increasingly adopt cloud-based platforms, embedded banking is likely to become preferred model.
  • BaaS will also help more digital-first service provides offer financial services such as lending and payments within their apps and marketplaces.

Key trends in the use of transaction banking service channels are summarized in Figure 7 below.

Figure 7. Key trends in the use of transaction banking service channels

Across all API service models, the developer portals, sandbox environments and no-code onboarding would be required. Developer portals and sandbox environments in particular represent the infrastructure as a bare minimum for deploying an API model. Global top banks further seek to differentiate themselves competitively by adding services such as analyzing API call data and providing the results of this data analysis. Banks deploying an API model must also look at the delivery method and the value added. Below are some of the messages we received from people involved at major global banks when we conducted above research.

2. Challenges and Approaches for New Service Models in Transaction Banking

1) Challenges for banks

There are challenges that arise for traditional banks that aim to apply new, API-driven service models in transaction banking and compete in the market. Examples are listed below.

Strategy and positioning

  • Further advancing cooperation with ERP providers and Fintech companies, and competing with major global banks that are forming ecosystems
  • Regionally fragmented or in-region competition in North America, South America, Europe, Southeast Asia, etc.
  • Competition with Fintech companies and third-party platformers

Challenges in implementation

  • Building an API security framework in line with industry-standard security practices, data formats, and the regulatory requirements of different countries and regions,*9 while maintaining globally integrated operations (see Figure 8)
  • Preparing architecture aimed at expansion in outward-facing API transactions
Figure 8. Examples of API security and inter-operability layers

*9: Typical case is EU’s PSD2. For example, in the UAE, transactions are required to pass through API platforms designated by the authority such as Core42

2) Approaches to achieving competitive advantages

For banks, expanding their service and channel lineups would be a workable way of gaining and retaining new customers. However, it requires both monetary resource and technological capacity to get in the ring with the top global banks. It would necessitate not only a turn towards an IT investment-focused planning, but also organizational and operational changes within the bank.

If banks struggle to invest on the same scale as the top global banks, how should they devise their business and competition strategies? While internal infrastructure for API call and processing are the minimum requirement, the realistic approach would be to identify the areas where banks can competitively differentiate themselves, and then to build the business strategies for product designs which prioritize the investment. To differentiate themselves, banks must not only analyze their strengths and the market, but also define their target client segments, establish cooperation strategies with other players, specify their business models and added-value and clarify their monetization policies.

  1. Product strategy
    • Differentiation against the competition
      • Identifying target customers and deeply investigating differentiation strategy (example: strong business presence to general trading company which is a Japanese corporate form globally unique, and the formation and promotion of a joint development project for API-based service implementation)
      • Providing added value (example: advisory services for designing fund liquidity structure and pooling strategy, big data analysis of Data-as-a-Service and API call data, technical advice and implementation support for API connectivity, etc.)
      • Region-focused localization strategy (Asia, Europe, North America, etc.)
      • Solution offerings specialized to specific industries (example: linking an API to a supply chain platform that automotive companies and associated companies are onboarded.)
    • Improving capabilities through cooperation
      • Deepening the model for cooperating with Fintech companies
      • Strategic partnerships with ERP and TMS providers
      • Partnership with other financial institutions
    • Flexible trial of monetization models
      • Application of different pricing models depending on scale of client, transaction volume and number of API calls, etc.
      • Considering low-code/no-code service delivery for SMEs
      • Pursuing indirect revenue
  2. System platform investment
    • API developer portals and API marketplaces, maintenance and enrichment of developer documentation and sandbox (table stakes)
    • Development of an API platform
    • Building the platform and connectivity with partners
    • Automation of customer onboarding
    • Improving STP rate in back-end systems, expanding the processing capacity of core banking systems
    • Applying AI-driven pricing and monitoring tools
  3. Change of bank internal operation
    • Building internal bank operations responsive to the calls/ transactions via API and service applications
  4. Organizational and HR transformation
    • Transformation of the sales structure (shifting from RM sales to developer experience-focused)
    • Education and employment of personnel who can build API ecosystems
    • Building and strengthening a team dedicated to customer onboarding

By incorporating the above points into their business and competitive strategies, banks can increase their competitiveness in the transaction banking market and treat new currents of API and embedded banking as new opportunities for growth. Establishing the position by leveraging the strengths will be key to success.

3. In conclusion

ABeam Consulting provides comprehensive support in transaction banking, ranging from the formulation of global, regional, and country-level business strategies, to service development, implementation, and data-driven performance enhancement. In addition to extensive experience supporting corporates in cash and treasury management, supply chain management and global and domestic ERP implementation, ABeam Consulting also excels in developing growth strategies across all layers of transaction banking players (banks, ERP/TMS providers, Fintech companies, end-user companies) and supporting their execution. If you are looking for the partner to develop the business plan and/ or to implement the transformation in transaction banking, please feel free to contact us.


Contact

Click here for inquiries and consultations