① The Problem of Strategy
In many cases, the positioning or priority of efforts to improve customer experience amidst the many initiatives that form part of managing a company can become ambiguous. In such cases, if temporary fiscal pressures become severe, we often see companies engage in ad hoc responses such as concentrating resources in immediate measures to increase sales or reduce costs, lowering the priority of initiatives to improve customer experience.
Even when efforts to improve customer experience do manage to be a priority, ambiguity in goals and targets can often lead to cases where progress is scattershot because there is no shared direction among all team members, or cases where companies fail to engage in efforts that have value for customers, due to a lack of customer understanding.
② Organizational Problems
Initiatives to improve customer experience often span multiple departments. It can be difficult to try to improve customer experience, however, while maintaining consistency throughout the process, if there is a lack of operational or informational coordination across departments.
If budgets are managed on a per department basis, there can also be cases where budget is not distributed adequately across departments for efforts to improve customer experience to succeed.
③ Systemic (Processes and Systems) Problems
There are many companies that are forced to minimize the resources in terms of budget and personnel that they dedicate to improving customer experience, because they cannot clearly ascertain the effects on sales and profit that investment in such efforts will bring.
The cause of this lies in inadequate frameworks of processes and system platforms for measuring impact, such as in cases where indicators for measuring impact to determine the status or outcomes of improvements to customer experience are unclear, or cases where, even if the indicators have been clarified, companies are failing to properly analyze the data.
For example, many companies that have introduced NPS® (Net Promoter Score) as an indicator to measure customer loyalty (trust or attachment) are dissatisfied with the system, but in using this indicator, companies need to refer to it with a proper understanding of its nature. Culturally speaking, Japanese customers tend to take recommending products and services to others very seriously, and so tend avoid influencing the choices of others, so NPS® tends to result in lower likeliness to recommend. Japanese customers also tend to assign middle scores when they rate things, so NPS® tends to be lower. For this reason, when measuring the outcomes of improvements to customer experience in Japan, there is a risk that just relying on NPS® will not lead to an appropriate evaluation, so companies may be better off considering a combination of multiple indicators such as Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT).