Tokenized Deposits and the Shift to 24/7 Bank Payment Infrastructure: Toward an Era of Immediately Usable Liquidity

Insight
Jul 17, 2026
  • Banking/Capital Markets
  • Technology Transformation
  • Global
GettyImages-2187991365

Bank payment infrastructure is entering a period of major transition. Corporate CFOs are shifting their focus from simply “visualizing” account balances to ensuring that funds are available for use whenever and wherever they are needed. At the same time, Japan’s banking systems still contain time gaps in which liquidity remains idle, reflecting long-standing constraints around business days and operating hours. This paper explores a phased modernization strategy for financial infrastructure that can close this gap by using blockchain technology, particularly tokenized deposits. Here, “modernization” refers to three objectives: 1) enabling 24/7/365 always-on operations, 2) supporting real-time settlement and immediate movement of funds, and 3) extending functionality step by step while making use of existing core banking systems. Rather than focusing on new business development, this paper addresses current operational challenges, presents a path toward 24/7 capabilities through a sidecar model that coexists with legacy systems, and discusses the thinking behind phased implementation and future prospects.

About the Author

  • Takuya Watanabe

    Takuya Watanabe

    Director
  • Rie Furukawa

    Rie Furukawa

    Manager

Chapter 1: The Paradigm Shift Toward “Usable Liquidity” — Why Bank Infrastructure Modernization Is Needed Now

For CFOs and treasurers of companies operating globally, expectations of banks are shifting significantly: from knowing where funds are held (“visibility”) to being able to move and use those funds immediately at the time and place they are needed (“usability”). Traditionally, banks have focused on accurately managing account balances across locations and processing payments safely. For corporates, however, building an operating model that minimizes idle cash and allows funds to be deployed into the business at any time, 24/7/365, is increasingly becoming a source of competitive advantage. In practice, multinational enterprises still face repeated cases in which time zones and weekend constraints prevent funds from being mobilized efficiently. For Japanese companies, for example, cross-border payments can be constrained by the operating hours of systems on both the sending and receiving sides, correspondent bank cut-off times, and processing across multiple time zones. As a result, even when an overseas subsidiary faces a funding shortfall during a Japanese holiday or overnight period, funds cannot always be supplied immediately, creating periods in which liquidity remains trapped.

In this respect, the gap with leading overseas banks in cross-border payments has become increasingly visible. Major banks in Europe and the United States have already begun offering global payment services that operate around the clock. Citigroup, for instance, has enabled 24/7 cross-border payments through its own digital platform, while HSBC has expanded services in response to European instant payment requirements that mandate immediate settlement on all business days. These initiatives are designed around corporate liquidity needs. By contrast, while domestic transfers in Japan have moved toward 24-hour availability through the Zengin More Time System, Japanese banks still tend to rely on long-standing daily batch-processing structures for cross-border payments. There remains substantial room to advance capabilities such as real-time global transfers and continuous balance management. If this gap persists, it could affect the competitiveness of Japanese banks in the global transaction banking market. Modernizing payment infrastructure is therefore a high-priority management agenda for Japanese banks seeking to maintain trusted relationships with corporate clients and preserve their presence in global markets.

Figure 1. Paradigm shift in the value proposition for cross-border payments and global liquidity management — Comparison of domestic and overseas banks

Chapter 2: Perspectives Missed by Discussions Focused on “New Use Cases” Using Blockchains

In Japan’s financial sector, recent discussion of blockchain technology has tended to focus on high-profile use cases such as new services and crypto-assets. From the viewpoint of practitioners in transaction banking, however, many of these approaches have required careful assessment from the perspective of practical applicability. No matter how innovative an idea may be, it is difficult to gain internal support and secure budget within a bank unless the return on investment is clear. When technology-led new concepts move ahead of business logic, they may fail to answer the fundamental question from senior management: “How does this contribute to business profit?” This increases the risk that the initiative remains at the concept stage.

As a result, expectations for blockchain coexist with cautious views on its practical application in the field. Banks already have long-established operating processes, and when introducing new technology, the top priority is ensuring stable operations without creating inconsistencies with existing systems. It is therefore not enough to ask what blockchain can do. Unless the discussion explains which existing operational issues it will solve and how, it is difficult to gain full support from practitioners. What is needed is a perspective that redefines blockchain not as a means of creating new businesses, but as an infrastructure technology directly connected to solving current operational challenges.

Chapter 3: Redefining Blockchain as a Tool for Financial Infrastructure Renewal

How should blockchain technology be positioned so that it can contribute to the transformation of bank infrastructure? The key is to treat blockchain as a means, not an end. Japanese banking systems are large-scale legacy platforms centered on mainframes. Given this reality, phased modernization is more realistic than full replacement. One practical approach is to preserve robust existing core banking systems while attaching new technologies to surrounding areas or additional functions. This makes it possible to deliver new value steadily while reducing the large-scale investment and migration risks associated with a full replacement.

Focusing on blockchain’s programmability—the ability to execute automated processing based on contractual rules—makes it possible to control fund movements in ways that conventional systems have struggled to support. Examples include automatically completing designated transfers after business hours or executing pre-scheduled transactions at a specified time without manual intervention. Smart contracts can reduce human-dependent operations across a wide range of activities. If the “latent inefficiencies” currently embedded in daily payment operations, such as liquidity trapped overnight or on holidays and human errors, can be addressed through automated blockchain processing, the core operations of banks themselves could be strengthened. In addition to new service development, using blockchain as a means of infrastructure modernization can deliver practical and significant benefits for banks.
Through its support for multiple domestic financial institutions, ABeam Consulting has repeatedly observed a common conclusion: while full renewal may be examined as one option, the practical path for core-system modernization is to retain existing foundations and attach or extend specific functions externally. This practical conclusion forms the starting point for the “sidecar model” discussed in the next chapter.

Chapter 4: Sidecar Model Modernization Enabled by Tokenized Deposits — A Legacy-Coexistence Approach

For banks with existing systems, the sidecar model is gaining attention as a practical approach to introducing blockchain. Rather than decommissioning existing core banking systems and replacing them with new ones, this approach places a blockchain platform alongside the existing infrastructure and uses it to complement required functions. Specifically, a secondary ledger is built on blockchain in coordination with the current core banking system, enabling 24-hour settlement and flexible liquidity management. The idea is to externally attach blockchain’s agility and automation while preserving the reliability of existing systems.

Figure 2. Conceptual image of the sidecar model

This sidecar model offers major advantages for both management and operations. From a management perspective, it can 1) substantially reduce initial investment compared with a full replacement, 2) lower migration risk because it is introduced in parallel while the existing core system continues to operate, and 3) allow investment decisions to be made flexibly through phased addition of functions. From an operational perspective, it can 4) reduce operational burden because new functions can be added without significantly changing existing workflows, 5) allow new technology to be tested while maintaining the stability and reliability of existing systems, and 6) make it easier to secure time for training and adoption through phased rollout. At the center of the sidecar model are tokenized deposits. Tokenized deposits represent the value of bank deposits as digital assets on blockchain—in effect, operating a “blockchain-based deposit account.” For example, J.P. Morgan has built blockchain deposit accounts (BDA) on its own on-chain network and has commercialized global 24-hour instant transfer services for U.S. dollar funds. Through these accounts, interbank and intra-group fund movements can be processed in real time, 365 days a year. Many other major overseas banks are also advancing 24/7 settlement capabilities using tokenization technology. In short, banks can build an always-on new settlement layer based on tokenized deposits without making major changes to their existing core systems, thereby modernizing the overall payment infrastructure.

Figure 3. Tokenized deposit initiatives by overseas banks

That said, several issues must be addressed to realize the sidecar model. The first is the operation of a secondary ledger, or sub-ledger. Normally, banks close their core banking systems and finalize balances at the end of the business day. However, a ledger is needed to continue recording transactions that may occur on blockchain after that point. This makes the concept of a stand-in account important: transactions during non-operating hours are temporarily recorded and settled, then synchronized with the existing core system on a delayed basis the next business day. The second issue is regulatory and accounting treatment. It will be important to establish internal control processes that reliably reflect blockchain-based transactions in the offline general ledger, as well as accounting and disclosure methods for tokenized deposits. Careful design is also needed for security, such as private-key management and access controls, and for governance, such as rules for reversing erroneous operations.

Chapter 5: A Strategy for Phased Implementation

The usefulness of blockchain is clear, but a phased approach is more realistic than full-scale rollout from the outset. This makes a phased implementation strategy essential. Once priority areas have been identified, banks should begin with pilots in limited domains. For example, they could narrow the scope to a particular currency zone or region where demand is high, and benefits are easy to measure and conduct trial operations for a 24-hour payment service using tokenized deposits. One possible project would be to select a corporate group with strong global needs for immediate U.S. dollar fund movements and monitor intra-group liquidity transfers for six months to one year. If such a proof of concept can demonstrate concrete benefits through data, such as improved liquidity efficiency and reduced administrative burden, it can provide a foothold for the next step.

Once results have been confirmed through the pilot, the bank can move to phased functional expansion and standardization. What was initially limited to one currency and one-use case can gradually be expanded to additional currencies, regions, and transaction types. For example, a service that begins with U.S. dollar transfers could next be applied to the euro or yen; an instant fund transfer service limited to a specific corporate group could be expanded to counterparties or interbank settlement. By setting KPIs at each stage and applying phase-gate management—moving to the next phase only when issues have been resolved—banks can advance bold transformation while making risks visible. The ultimate objective after these steps is a platform that manages liquidity across the globe in an integrated manner. Building a mechanism that uses tokenized deposits to allocate funds across multiple currencies and regions on a 24-hour, non-stop basis will contribute to banks’ long-term competitiveness.

Chapter 6: Starting Small and Opening a Path to Transformation

Japanese banks are now being asked to respond to increasingly global payment needs. It is true that they will face issues such as regulatory complexity and the lack of precedent, but it is desirable to move quickly into concrete examination. Rather, the important point is to clarify, one by one, what can be started first and to begin with small steps. The first step should be an assessment of the current state in preparation for 24-hour operations. Banks should identify current processes such as overnight batch processing and examine how they can be shortened; prepare staffing and monitoring structures for nights and holidays; and list near-term issues and preparation items, including regulatory responses related to electronic payment instruments, such as Japan’s stablecoin regulations introduced through the 2023 amendment to the Payment Services Act. At the same time, banks should inventory customer needs and select priority domains and currencies. By prioritizing from the perspective of which currencies and regions will produce the greatest effect and which areas are most likely to gain internal and external agreement, banks can maximize the benefits of initial implementation.

Above all, the most important attitude is to take action, even if the first step is small. Banks should take a cautious first step, then use the results and lessons learned from practice to inform the next action. In fact, many overseas banks have begun with limited pilots involving selected clients before gradually expanding the scope of deployment. Taking the first step will become the foundation for winning future competition and opening new horizons.

Conclusion: Outlook for Payment Infrastructure Modernization and ABeam’s Support

This paper has examined changes in the environment surrounding corporate treasury and a phased modernization strategy for financial infrastructure using blockchain technology. The new trends in global payments represent a major opportunity for banks. Faster and 24-hour payments can go beyond improving bank-service efficiency and reducing costs; they may also enhance fundamental value by optimizing corporate working capital, strengthening global supply chains, and creating new financial services.

To truly capture these benefits, banks themselves must take the initiative. Concrete actions are required, such as reviewing current processes, identifying areas that can be modernized through a sidecar model, inventorying corporate clients’ 24/7 liquidity needs, selecting priority use cases and currency markets, and launching pilots. In the implementation phase, banks should form cross-functional teams, design roadmaps for phased introduction, and proceed with activities such as incorporating the initiative into IT strategy and conducting technical verification in limited domains. Starting small, confirming the effects, and then expanding step by step based on proven success patterns—this is the surest path toward transformation.

ABeam Consulting has extensive experience supporting numerous financial institutions and corporations in Japan and overseas in advancing global payments, liquidity management, and digital transformation. We bring knowledge from both the banking and corporate perspectives. When undertaking the kind of financial infrastructure modernization discussed in this paper, ABeam can provide support across each phase, from current-state assessment and phased implementation design and execution to regulatory response and globally integrated operations. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss how we can help.


Contact

Click here for inquiries and consultations